Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jakub Mensik vs Hazem Naow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mensik vs Naow analysis and find out who is favored!
Jakub Mensik vs Hazem Naow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mensik 1 - 0 Naow
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mensik has won 52.57% of points on their second serve, while Naow has won 48.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mensik, in recent form, has won 50% of their opponent's second serve points, while Naow has won 56.54%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.07% and 34.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mensik has saved 71.59% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naow has saved 62.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mensik has won 62.07% of matches played (W/L 36/ 22), with Naow winning 67.95% (W/L 53/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mensik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 45/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 37/ 27). Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 65/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 55/ 39).
- Player level: In the last year, Mensik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.33% of matches (W/L 16/ 14), where as Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.92% of matches (W/L 35/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mensik winning 1 times and Naow being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mensik winning 2 and Naow winning 1. The last match between Mensik and Naow was at the M25 Sarreguemines, 25-10-2022, First, Carpet with Jakub Mensik getting the victory 6-7(1) 6-3 7-6(7).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:35:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mensik and Naow have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mensik winning 1 times and Naow 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Mensik winning 1, and Naow 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mensik has played against opponents with an average rank of 202.26 while Naow has played against players with an average rank of 194.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mensik has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naow has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mensik has converted 43.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naow has converted 43.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
79
Rank
65
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
345
Rank
323
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
65% (95-52)
Career Total W/L
65% (152-81)
69% (20-9)
YTD W/L
71% (27-11)
$645,030
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jakub Mensik | Hazem Naow |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:35:0 | 2:35:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (55/97) | 76% (90/118) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (46/55) | 70% (63/90) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (27/42) | 61% (17/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 20% (2/10) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (38/118) | 25% (24/97) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(1) 6-3 7-6(7) |
Stats 
Jakub Mensik
Player
Hazem Naow
57%
(
55 of
97)
1st Serve %
76%
(
90 of
118)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
84%
(
46 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
63 of
90)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
24 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
38 of
118)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jakub Mensik | Hazem Naow |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (20/9) | 71% (27/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (44/24) | 66% (56/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (351/319) | 55% (433/350) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (17/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 62% (8/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 76% (19/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.75 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 246 | 78 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 87 | 137 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:38 | 1:37:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 174.62 | 255.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1300/2194) | 63% (1634/2598) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (959/1300) | 69% (1126/1634) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (470/894) | 49% (471/964) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (61/141) | 43% (130/300) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (713/2024) | 43% (1096/2554) |
| Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (6/2) | 68% (15/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (12/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (19/27) | 71% (27/38) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (10/15) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 78% (7/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (21/19) | 100% (23/23) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (21/2) | 0% (23/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 27% (15/4) |
Jakub Mensik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Jakub Mensik
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
6
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Jakub Mensik
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve %
56%
(
10 of
18)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
11 of
12)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
28
Total Points Won
11
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
59%
(
74 of
126)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
16
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
54%
(
28 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
47 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Jakub Mensik
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
16 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Luca Nardi
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
79%
(
37 of
47)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Jakub Mensik
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
8
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
24 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Seong Chan Hong
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Jakub Mensik
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
57
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(7) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Borna Coric
61%
(
66 of
109)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
18
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Hazem Naow
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Hazem Naow
95%
(
54 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
85%
(
52 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Hazem Naow
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Hazem Naow
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Mae Malige
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
36%
(
15 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Dario Huber
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Hazem Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Mensik Vs Naow Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Mensik are available here and Naow photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jakub Mensik
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
